• Number of different domain/ application ontologies interconnected to/within OASIS COF (year 1: 6, year 2: 12, year 3-4: 20).
• Number of SP2 and SP3 applications connected to the OASIS COF (year 2: 2, year 3: 8, year 4: All).
• Number of SP2 and SP3 applications successfully interconnected (sharing data) through the COF (interoperability indicator)(year 2: 2, year 3: 8, year 4: All).
• Ontology GUI, allowing connection by a non expert software engineer of a new service in maximum one day and a whole ontology in maximum one week, to OASIS COF, without any help required in 75% of the cases.
• Ontological GUI feedback from at least 10 Consortium and 10 external service providers, showing usability and usefulness mean scores over 7 in a 0-10 scale.

• Degree to which the developed tools will enable the project to easily create interactive services that: (a) are tightly integrated with the project’s semantic substrate; (b) seamlessly adapt to the user’s needs and device characteristics; and, (c) are accessible by the project’s target population on the range of supported devices.

• Provision of an integrated functioning AMI prototype that will be evaluated against all WP2.1 and WP3.1 real user cases and user devices in SP4.
• Degree of innovation achieved in terms of agent deliberation mechanisms, as well as information filtering techniques.

• A well documented and consistent system architecture according to established practices.
• Instantiation of the OASIS platform according to the specific needs of SP2 and SP3.

• Interviews with at least 100 users in sheltered homes, 100 users living alone and 80 formal/informal carers and medical practitioners from at least 4 European Countries.
• At least 15 UC’s for SP2 applications fully described.

• Ability to create an individual nutritional profile and nutritional plan.
• Ability to use data from other applications and share data with them as well.
• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness, reliability and usefulness positive rating by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10) (Year 3: 60%, Year 4: 80%).

• Completion of an intelligent activity management system (coach).
• Reliability of fall and other accidents detection: capability of sensor system with sensitivity over 90% (detection rate) and specificity of over 98% (minimization of false alarm rate).
• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness, reliability and usefulness positive rating by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10) (Year 3: 60%, Year 4: 80%).

• Overall stress assessment system specificity (false detection rate of stress) over 95% and sensitivity (no miss detection rate) over 80%.
• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness, reliability and usefulness positive rating by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10) (Year 3: 60%, Year 4: 80%).

• Percentage of end-users stating increase of their social activities thanks to the specific application.
• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness, reliability and usefulness positive rating by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10) (Year 3: 60%, Year 4: 80%).

• Degree of personalization and adaptivity to the user-specific health conditions and general profile, as well as degree of context-awareness.
• High relevance (over 90%) of the health warnings sent to the control centres/care givers, according to the dangerousness of the health situations detected.
• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness, reliability and usefulness positive rating by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10) (Year 3: 60%, Year 4: 80%).

• Localisation accuracy of ±0.5m insider the user’s home.
• Ability to control automatically or semi-automatically at least 25 different devices through the OASIS platform.
• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness, reliability and usefulness positive rating by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10) (Year 3: 60%, Year 4: 80%).

• Interviews with at least 120 elderly and 40 formal/informal carers from at least 4 European countries.
• At least 15 UC’s for SP3 applications fully described.

• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness, reliability and usefulness positive rating by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10) (Year 3: 75%, Year 4: 85%).
• Percentage of end-users stating increase of their mobility (Year 3: 65%, Year 4: 80%).

• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness, reliability and usefulness positive rating by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10) (Year 3: 75%, Year 4: 85%).
• Percentage of end-users stating increase of their mobility (Year 3: 65%, Year 4: 80%).

• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness, reliability and usefulness positive rating by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10) (Year 3: 75%, Year 4: 85%).
• Percentage of end-users stating increase of their mobility activities (incl. tourism, leisure and re-creation activities) thanks to the OASIS applications (Year 3: 65%, Year 4: 80%).
• Two fully functional vehicle demonstrators, with services / algorithms’ reliability over 95% (for telematics) and 80% (for stress and comfort detection issues).

• Percentage of end-users stating increase of their work-ability and comfort while working thanks to the OASIS applications (Year 3: 60%, Year 4: 75%).
• Successful implementation of interface migration mechanism in the OASIS platform that facilitates the interaction of elderly users with an application while freely moving from one device to another.
• Functional Smart Workplaces prototypes and demos to provide an intelligent dialoguing approach between the elderly worker and the required devices.

• All relevant end user, carer and service centre UI’s integrated within the OASIS solution.
• Percentage of usability, user-friendliness and reliability positive rating with regard to the interfaces by users (i.e. rating of over 7 in a scale of 1 – 10).

•   Percentage of sensors/devices seamlessly interconnected (Year 3: 75%, Year 4: 90%)

Month 36

(re-evaluated Month 46)

• Percentage of OASIS services supporting SP2 and SP3 applications successfully integrated according to WP1.6 specifications (Year 3: 80%, Year 4: 90%).

• Percentage of SP2 and SP3 applications running successfully on tablet PC, PDA in real time (Year 3: 75%, Year 4: 90%).

• Percentage of SP2 and SP3 applications running successfully on smart phone in real time (Year 3: 60%, Year 4: 75%).

• Percentage of SP2 and SP3 applications running successfully on automotive platform in real time (Year 3: 75%, Year 4: 90%).

• Percentage of end-users who find the OASIS demonstrators appealing or very appealing (Year 3: 65%, Year 4: 80%).

• Number of participants to the Conference (min. 100) and number and quality of published papers in the proceedings: min. 30 published papers that have undergone review process to ensure high quality. 

• Number of participants to the Conference (min. 150) and number and quality of published papers in the proceedings: min. 45 published papers that have undergone review process to ensure high quality. 

• Percentage of end-users (at least 75%) with a positive attitude towards the OASIS demonstrators who would consider installing an OASIS-based set of applications in their home, further rating good device availability, easy installation and reasonable costs.
• 2-4 spin-offs set up to exploit OASIS results.

• Timely completion of the requirements capture and the design phases.

• Number of industries joining the OASIS Industrial Forum (Year 1: 5, Year 2: 8, Year 3: 12, Year 4: 15)